Probably the hardest thing to film well is a thick, quality nostril exhale, which almost has to be shot in a studio setting to get the highest quality, at least in my opinion. Specialized Videos gets the credit for this one.
Its almost embarrssing to admit, but I just recently stumbled upon the good smoking fetish site Smoking Seduction, even moreso because they have a link to this site and they've obviously been there for a while, but better late than never for this site which has tons of pics and focuses on celebs and well known internet stars as the objects of most of its pics/galleries. This one is of adult film star Jill Kelly smoking.
One of the many smoking fetish sites that originate across the pond, British based Smoking Heaven is always good for some sultry smoking pics, like this one.
This is another quality pic from Random Snaps, one of the highest quality smoking fetish sites on the web. Models are always allutring, always obvious in real life smokers, and the smoke is always captured bery well.
There is a site that shows some promise that I recently stumbled upon, Smokekiss. I don't know much about them other than their pictures and theme, women kissing and smoking, will probably appeal to many fetishists out there. I will be keeping an eye on them as the develop content.
I have never been a member of the site Lightup Time (formerly known as Smokevision), mainly because it is so darn expensive, I can't see paying 40 bucks per month for a site membership. However, I will say that their photographic work is first rate, and you have to give it to any website that tries to step put of the box, so to speak. If you do not mind paying top dollar for you memberships, check them out.
I think you have to hand it to SmokingModels, one of the best smoking sites out there in terms of videography and quality of filming the all important exhales. No doubt about it.
is the best way to describe Visualsmoke, in my opinion. As I've blogged about before, they probably have the best recurring price for smoking content on the net, but most importantly, the work is always quality smoking content. Scott, the owner/producer, understands the niche and knows what members of the smoking fetish community want. He's been giving it to them for years and, hopefully, will continue for years to come.
This is another model from Specialized Video, a site that I have praised as having some of the best lighting in the business.
Well, the other day I took the plunge and got a membership to this site.
As for the cold, hard, facts, you can purchase a membership for $19.95, with a slight discount for buying a three or six month membership. All of the content that has been shot over the years is not in the membership area. There are about 8 galleries of pictures, maybe 700 or 800 in all, along with three groups of various MPEGs, one group of "All Stars", and one group of "Full Scenes". Most of the clips, as advertised, average 1 minute, with some being as short as 30 seconds and view over 2 minutes. This does not count the Full Scenes, which seem to run 5-7 minutes.
There is no question about the quality of smoking or variety of models, particularly if you are into the "girl next door" look. Don't get me wrong, some of the models are gorgeous, just not the webmistress/model kind, but the kind of girl you might see in a restaurant. The smoking is very good, with the exhales always well lit.
As for negatives, the sound leaves a lot to be desired, with it being fairly haphazard on the clips. Its seems as if it is added on the clip, which may bother some people. My biggest gripe is that, as a member, I don't get access to all of the material. I have to be a member for an unknown length of time to see that. Plus, the clips aren't easily described other than model name and pic. Sometimes you might like to know when a clip was shot or how long it is before you open it or download it. Also, although there is a great variety of models, the settings and backgrounds are not that varied.
On the whole, though, this is a very good site and well worth the money for a month or six. I'm just of the opinion that it could be better and more user friendly than it is.
